It's easier to clone embryo than to figure consequences

Finally we need to keep in mind that the pre-embryo is a living organism and bears the human genotype. As such it manifests a certain intrinsic value. The pre-embryo formed of human egg and sperm is neither a product that is the sum of its parts nor the result of a manufacturing process. It is a living, developing organism and the ultimate end of that development is quite clear.

While the moral standing of this organism might not be the same as that of the adult, nonetheless the pre-embryo has some moral standing, given what it is. One can, on that basis, argue for some forms of protection, even though one might not be able to argue for absolute protection. Therefore, claims of privacy or autonomy alone are not sufficient justification for the treatment of the pre-embryo. The moral standing of the pre-embryo must also be taken into account.

Retreat after crossing a line is always difficult. But perhaps a moratorium on research, similar to the one called for in light of the potential problematic implications of recombinant DNA technologies, is in order. Our competitive scientific edge will not be lost and our common humanity will be enhanced by a consideration of the implications of such experiment before we rush to clinical applications.

The Vatican document on artificial reproduction says that "our era needs such wisdom more than bygone ages if the discoveries made by man are to be further humanized" (Intro, 1). Perhaps a moratorium on such experiments as we consider their ethical significance would manifest such wisdom.

COPYRIGHT 1993 National Catholic Reporter
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group