Should 'monsignor' retire?

In our diocesan newspaper, the Catholic Sun, Bishop James Moynihan writes a beautiful explanation of his rationale for asking the Holy Father to name 11 new monsignors in the diocese of Syracuse, N.Y. He sees this as an affirmation of all clergy and even the faithful. Two priests self-effacingly call it "really an honor for the parishes." Perhaps that's so, but then awarding this to an individual when priests serve many parishes in a career seems off the mark. Knowing many of these men personally, I surely appreciate that they are deserving. But for them to be now so designated and set apart from brother clergy by this designation after a 30-year absence of this title seems divisive even as others celebrate with and for them. Is this really a value to the Christian community?

Are they like members of a "hall of fame" or "all-star team" that in some way honors both an organization and its fans, but by definition excludes other possible candidates that don't get the votes?

I respect, support and appreciate the bishop's desire and dilemma to both reward and/or perhaps to elevate some role models within the clergy after the difficulties of recent years. All of us are grateful for the many years of service by these men. But we each also know so many other clergy who are just as holy and hard-working. We also know many religious women who serve so well without papal titles. I believe this title of "monsignor," though traditional, has outlived its usefulness for the future and should be honorably retired.

DAVID E. PASINSKI

Syracuse, N.Y.

COPYRIGHT 2007 National Catholic Reporter
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning